Optimize · Personalization at Scale
Personalize a Sequence by Industry Vertical
Take one base 4-touch sequence and produce vertical-specific variants (DTC, B2B SaaS, local services, etc.) with vertical-true examples, pain points, and proof.
managerfounderAdvanced⏱ ~4 hrs per vertical variant
When to use
Use when your agency works across multiple verticals and your generic sequence underperforms because the examples and pain points don't land. This prompt rewrites your base sequence per vertical — same structure and cadence, but swapped pain points, proof points, jargon, and case study references.
The prompt
You are a head of demand at a digital marketing agency. You know that a sequence written for "everyone" reads like it's for no one — so you ship vertical-true variants. Agency: [AGENCY_NAME] — [SERVICES] Base 4-touch sequence (with structure to preserve): [SEQUENCE_TEMPLATE] Vertical to personalize for: [VERTICAL] Agency proof points / case studies (use only what fits this vertical): [PROOF_BANK] Vertical-specific pain points / jargon notes (optional): [VERTICAL_NOTES] Rewrite the 4-touch sequence so it reads like it was written specifically for [VERTICAL] buyers — same cadence, same intent per touch, but vertical-true language and proof. - Keep the 4-touch structure: Touch 1 = opener + soft CTA. Touch 2 = value drop (specific to vertical). Touch 3 = proof/case study (only if a real one exists in [PROOF_BANK] for this vertical). Touch 4 = break-up. - Pain points and examples MUST be vertical-true. If [VERTICAL] is "DTC ecommerce", don't reference "MQLs" or "sales cycles". - Only cite case studies from [PROOF_BANK]. If none fit [VERTICAL], replace Touch 3 with a vertical-specific observation (not a fake case study) and flag it. - Preserve sender voice — tone in the base sequence is the tone. - Don't invent metrics. If [PROOF_BANK] says "+34% organic in 6 mo", use that exact number. Vertical: [VERTICAL] Touch 1 — Day 1 Subject: ... Body: ... Touch 2 — Day 4 Subject: ... Body: ... Touch 3 — Day 8 Subject: ... Body: ... [If no proof fits: "NO MATCHING CASE STUDY — Touch 3 uses observation instead"] Touch 4 — Day 14 (break-up) Subject: ... Body: ... At the end: 3-bullet "What I changed vs. base" diff.
Variables
- [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency
- [SERVICES] — Services you offer
- [SEQUENCE_TEMPLATE] — Your base 4-touch sequence with subjects and bodies
- [VERTICAL] — e.g., DTC ecommerce, B2B SaaS, multi-location dental, SMB legal
- [PROOF_BANK] — Real case studies / metrics — vertical, client type, outcome
- [VERTICAL_NOTES] — Optional: jargon, common objections, buying triggers for this vertical
Example input
AGENCY_NAME: Northpoint Digital SERVICES: SEO + content SEQUENCE_TEMPLATE: 4-touch generic SaaS sequence — Day 1 opener, Day 4 value, Day 8 case study, Day 14 breakup. VERTICAL: DTC ecommerce (Shopify) PROOF_BANK: - Brand: Glowbar (DTC skincare) — +112% organic sessions in 5 months via collection-page SEO. - Brand: Latchpad (B2B SaaS) — +34% organic in 6 mo. VERTICAL_NOTES: DTC cares about ROAS, AOV, blended CAC. Skeptical of SEO because "slow".
Example output
Vertical: DTC ecommerce (Shopify) Touch 1 — Day 1 Subject: shopify collection pages Body: Most DTC brands we audit are leaving 6-figure organic revenue on the table because collection pages are templated and thin. Worth a 15-min look at yours? Touch 2 — Day 4 Subject: the boring SEO win Body: Quick one — adding a 120-word unique intro + an FAQ block to your top 5 collection pages usually moves them 3-8 spots within a month. Not flashy, just works on Shopify. Touch 3 — Day 8 Subject: glowbar case Body: We did this for Glowbar (skincare, Shopify) — +112% organic sessions in 5 months, mostly from collection pages. Happy to walk through the exact playbook. Touch 4 — Day 14 Subject: closing the loop Body: Going to stop bugging you. If SEO isn't a priority this quarter, no worries — door's open when it is. What I changed vs. base: - Swapped "MQLs" / "category pages" language for "collection pages" / "AOV" framing. - Replaced Latchpad SaaS case with Glowbar DTC case. - Touch 2 leans into "slow SEO" skepticism noted in VERTICAL_NOTES.
Pro tips
- Build a PROOF_BANK once, tagged by vertical — it makes every future sequence cheaper to spin up.
- Run the same prompt 3-4 times with different verticals, then send each to the matching list — never blast one variant.
- If Touch 3 returns 'NO MATCHING CASE STUDY', that's a real gap — get a case study or downgrade your ICP claim.
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS callRelated prompts