Free STAOS Tool
Sales Quota & Capacity Planner
"How many reps do I need to hit my number?" Enter your target, quota per rep, realistic attainment, ramp time, and rep churn — we'll back into the fully-ramped headcount and how many you have to hire to get there.
Estimate, not a quote. For planning only.
The benchmarks behind this
| Share of reps hitting full quota | ~63% |
| Average sales rep ramp | 3.1 months (SDR), 4–6 mo (AE) |
| Average rep tenure | 1.8 years |
| Pipeline coverage rule | 3× quota |
Sources: The Bridge Group (2023). See STAOS benchmarks dataset.
Most agencies under-hire — and then under-ramp the reps they have. Hire the math, not the gut feel. STAOS installs the structure that makes new reps productive months faster.
Built by STAOS — sales coaching & fractional sales management for agencies.
01 How it works
Back into the headcount instead of guessing it.
"How many reps do I need?" has an arithmetic answer, and it is almost always higher than the gut-feel one — because the gut forgets that new reps ramp and existing reps leave.
Annual revenue target, and quota per fully-ramped rep. Then the number most plans skip: expected attainment, the percentage of quota the average rep actually hits. Planning at 100% is planning to miss — around 63% of reps reach full quota.
Ramp time in months before a new rep is fully productive, average productivity during that ramp, and annual rep churn. These three turn a clean headcount number into the real one, because a rep hired in month nine contributes almost nothing to this year.
You get productive capacity per rep, fully-ramped reps needed, replacement reps to cover churn, and reps to hire this year. That last figure is the one to plan against — it already includes the people you will lose.
02 Questions
Capacity planning that survives contact with reality.
Because roughly 63% of reps hit full quota, per The Bridge Group. If you divide your target by quota and hire that many people, you have built a plan that only works if everyone is above average. Setting expected attainment to something like 70 or 80% is not pessimism, it is the observed distribution.
The Bridge Group puts average SDR ramp at 3.1 months and AEs at four to six, and sales leaders at six to nine. Whatever your figure is, measure it rather than assume it — most agencies discover their real ramp is longer than they believed, because they were counting from the first closed deal rather than from consistent quota performance.
Yes, and it is the input people most want to leave out. Average rep tenure is around 1.8 years, which means a team of six needs roughly one replacement hire a year just to stand still. Plan without it and you spend the year hiring reactively, which is slower and more expensive than hiring on a schedule.
Then one of the other inputs has to move, and the tool is showing you which. Raising attainment or shortening ramp are cheaper than headcount and are structure problems — onboarding, playbooks, tracking, coaching cadence. That is usually where we start, because adding people to a system that ramps slowly just adds more people ramping slowly.
No. Hiring in a cohort overwhelms whoever is doing the onboarding and lengthens everybody's ramp at exactly the moment you needed it short. Stagger them, and be honest that the last rep hired in a year contributes a fraction of a quota, not a whole one.
A common starting point is three to five times fully-loaded cost, then sense-check it against pipeline: the standard coverage rule is 3× quota in open pipeline, so a quota you cannot generate three times over in opportunities is a quota nobody can hit regardless of skill.
Free 20 minute sales audit
The number is the easy part.
This tool tells you what is true today. The audit tells you which lever to pull, in what order.
Book a Free Sales Audit