Structure · Offer / Positioning / Messaging
Generate a "Why Us vs Other Agencies" Differentiator List
Produce a ranked, evidence-backed list of differentiators reps can drop into proposals and discovery rebuttals.
foundermanagerrepIntermediate⏱ 3-5 hours
When to use
Use when prospects keep saying "you all sound the same" or your win rate against named competitors is slipping. Run it before a competitive bake-off, before updating your pitch deck's competitive slide, or when onboarding a new sales hire who needs ammunition. Best after you have run at least 5 win/loss interviews so the inputs are real.
The prompt
You are a competitive intelligence analyst for digital marketing agencies. You are skeptical, hate marketing fluff, and only accept differentiators that pass the "could a competitor truthfully say this too?" test. Our agency: [AGENCY_NAME] — [SERVICES] ICP: [ICP_DESC] Top 3 competitors we lose to: [COMPETITORS] Our process, tools, team, guarantees: [INTERNAL_FACTS] Client outcomes with proof (numbers, timeframes): [PROOF_POINTS] Things we refuse to do that others will: [ANTI_OFFERINGS] Generate exactly 7 differentiators ranked by defensibility (hardest to copy first). For each, write a one-line claim a rep can say on a call, the proof to back it up, and the specific competitor objection it neutralizes. - Reject any differentiator a competitor could honestly claim too (e.g., "senior team", "data-driven", "transparent reporting") — flag and replace - Each claim must be falsifiable (specific numbers, names, processes, guarantees) - Include at least 2 "anti-differentiators" (things we refuse to do) — these often win deals - Tone: confident, not boastful. No exclamation points. Table with columns: Rank | Differentiator (rep-ready one-liner) | Proof | Objection it neutralizes | Defensibility (1-10) Below the table, list any inputs you rejected and why.
Variables
- [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency name
- [SERVICES] — Service lines being sold
- [ICP_DESC] — Who you sell to
- [COMPETITORS] — Named competitors you lose to most often
- [INTERNAL_FACTS] — Process, tools, team credentials, guarantees, pricing model
- [PROOF_POINTS] — Client results with specific numbers, timeframes, and named accounts if shareable
- [ANTI_OFFERINGS] — Things you deliberately won't do (no long contracts, no white-label, no SMB, etc.)
Example input
Agency: Halftone — Shopify Plus design + CRO. ICP: DTC brands $5M-$30M doing in-house dev. Competitors: Eastside Co, Underwaterpistol, freelance Shopify devs. Internal: 100% Shopify Plus partners, in-house motion designer, 14-day kickoff guarantee, weekly CRO experiments. Proof: averaged +18% AOV across last 12 engagements, theme rebuild for Beardbrand shipped in 21 days. Anti: refuse retainers under 6 months, refuse non-Shopify projects.
Example output
| Rank | Differentiator | Proof | Objection neutralized | Defensibility | |---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | We only build on Shopify Plus — we won't touch BigCommerce, WooCommerce, or headless mashups | Listed Plus Partner since 2019; zero non-Shopify projects in 4 years | "Other agencies say they're platform-agnostic" | 9 | | 2 | Weekly CRO experiments built into every retainer, not quarterly | Last 12 clients averaged +18% AOV; experiment logs shareable | "How do I know I'll see lift between redesigns?" | 8 | | 3 | 14-day kickoff guarantee or first month free | 11 of last 12 engagements hit Day 14 launch | "Agencies always slip kickoffs" | 8 | | 4 | In-house motion designer on every account | Reels showing animated PDPs for Beardbrand, Vuori | "Other shops outsource motion" | 7 | | 5 | We refuse retainers under 6 months | Stated in MSA template | "Will you be invested in our wins?" | 6 | | 6 | Theme rebuilds in 21 days, not 90 | Beardbrand 21-day case study | "Redesigns take a quarter" | 7 | | 7 | We refuse SMB ($<$2M GMV) | ICP gate in qualification | "Will I get the B-team?" | 6 | Rejected: "senior strategists", "transparent reporting", "data-driven" — every competitor claims these.
Pro tips
- After generating, pressure-test each row by asking 'Would [Competitor X] honestly disagree?' — if no, cut it.
- Add the top 3 to your discovery-call script as proactive plants, not reactive rebuttals.
- Re-run quarterly — differentiators decay as competitors catch up.
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS callRelated prompts