Structure · Offer / Positioning / Messaging
Rewrite an Agency Homepage Hero in 30 Seconds
Generate three on-brand homepage hero variants (H1, subhead, primary CTA) that pass the 5-second clarity test.
foundermanagerBeginner⏱ 3-4 hours
When to use
Use when your homepage hero is vague ("We help brands grow") and bounce rate is high above the fold. Run it after you've nailed positioning but before a designer touches the page. Also useful when launching a new service line, repositioning for a new ICP, or running paid traffic to a homepage and watching conversion stall.
The prompt
You are a conversion copywriter who has rewritten homepage heroes for 100+ digital marketing agencies. You follow the rule that a homepage hero must answer in 5 seconds: "What is this? Who is it for? Why should I care? What do I do next?" Agency: [AGENCY_NAME] Positioning statement (source of truth): [POSITIONING] ICP visiting the homepage: [ICP_DESC] Current hero copy (H1 + subhead + CTA): [CURRENT_HOMEPAGE_COPY] What we want the visitor to DO: [PRIMARY_CTA_ACTION] Proof point we can show next to the hero: [SOCIAL_PROOF] Produce 3 distinct hero variants. Variant A = outcome-led, Variant B = mechanism-led, Variant C = anti-positioning (defines who we are NOT for). Each variant needs an H1 (≤10 words), a subhead (≤25 words), a primary CTA button (≤4 words), and a one-line proof caption. - H1 must name the ICP or the outcome — never both, never neither - Subhead must answer "how" without listing services - CTA must be a verb the visitor can do in one click (no "Learn More") - Ban: "growth partner", "we help X do Y", "unlock", "empower", "transform" - Variant C must explicitly name who should leave the page **Variant A — Outcome-led** H1: Subhead: CTA: Proof caption: **Variant B — Mechanism-led** [same] **Variant C — Anti-positioning** [same] Then 2-sentence recommendation on which to test first and why.
Variables
- [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency name
- [POSITIONING] — Your one-line positioning statement
- [ICP_DESC] — The ICP the homepage is targeting
- [CURRENT_HOMEPAGE_COPY] — Existing H1, subhead, CTA
- [PRIMARY_CTA_ACTION] — Book a call, get an audit, see pricing, etc.
- [SOCIAL_PROOF] — Client logos, a stat, a quote, or an award
Example input
Agency: Lumen Creative. Positioning: 'Brand and packaging design firm for emerging CPG brands ($1M-$10M) launching into Whole Foods and Sprouts.' ICP: founder/CMO of a CPG brand about to pitch retail. Current hero: H1 'Design that Sells' / Sub 'We help brands grow through design' / CTA 'Learn More'. CTA action: book a 20-min portfolio walkthrough. Proof: 14 brands placed in Whole Foods 2023-2024.
Example output
**Variant A — Outcome-led** H1: Packaging that earns retail shelf space. Subhead: We design CPG brands that get accepted into Whole Foods and Sprouts on the first pitch. CTA: Book portfolio walk Proof caption: 14 brands placed in Whole Foods, 2023-2024. **Variant B — Mechanism-led** H1: Retail-ready brand design for emerging CPG. Subhead: A 90-day brand and packaging system built around the buyer scorecards Whole Foods and Sprouts actually use. CTA: See the system Proof caption: Used by 14 Whole Foods brands. **Variant C — Anti-positioning** H1: For CPG brands going to retail. Not e-com only. Subhead: If you are pre-revenue, DTC-only, or below $1M, we are not the right fit — and we will tell you on the call. CTA: Check if we fit Proof caption: 14 Whole Foods placements; 0 DTC-only clients. **Recommend:** Test Variant A first — it pairs the outcome (shelf placement) with the strongest proof point. Variant C is the long-term winner if traffic skews unqualified.
Pro tips
- A/B test Variant A against your current hero in Google Optimize or VWO before committing.
- Steal the winning H1 for your LinkedIn headline and email signature — homepage clarity should cascade everywhere.
- If none of the variants feel right, your positioning input is weak — rerun 'Write an Agency Positioning Statement' first.
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS callRelated prompts