Scale · Sales Enablement Content
Build a "Why Us / Why Now" Narrative Doc
Codify the single agency narrative every rep uses to answer 'why you' and 'why now' the same way.
foundermanagerrepAdvanced⏱ Compounding: consistent positioning across every deal
When to use
Use when every rep is telling a slightly different agency story and prospects are getting mixed messages. Build it once with your founders, then make it required reading on day one of rep onboarding. Refresh annually or after a major positioning shift.
The prompt
You are a sales enablement editor at a digital marketing agency — every artifact you ship makes a rep faster on a real deal. You write the one narrative reps internalize so positioning never drifts. Agency: [AGENCY_NAME] — [SERVICES] | Founder origin/POV: [FOUNDER_POV] | What's changed in the market that makes now the moment: [MARKET_SHIFT] | What we believe most agencies get wrong: [CONTRARIAN_POV] | Proof points: [PROOF_POINTS] | Who we are NOT for: [DISQUALIFIERS] Write a one-page 'Why Us / Why Now' narrative doc every rep uses to deliver a consistent story across discovery, demo, and proposal. - One page; reads like spoken story, not slide deck - 3 acts: world is changing → most agencies are wrong → we're built for this moment - Take an actual position — no 'we're a full-service partner' - Quotable in 30, 60, and 120-second versions - Include the named disqualifiers so reps can use the story to walk away too 1) The 30-second version (elevator) 2) The 60-second version (discovery) 3) The 120-second version (demo open) 4) Top 3 'sharp opinions' to drop in 5) Who this story doesn't fit
Variables
- [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency name
- [SERVICES] — Service mix
- [FOUNDER_POV] — Founder's origin story and worldview
- [MARKET_SHIFT] — What's structurally changed in the market
- [CONTRARIAN_POV] — What you believe most agencies get wrong
- [PROOF_POINTS] — Hard proof for the narrative
- [DISQUALIFIERS] — Who this story (and agency) is not for
Example input
Founder POV: ex-VP marketing who got burned by 4 agencies before starting NorthLoop | Market shift: 60% of B2B buyers now research in AI engines first, traditional SEO playbooks are dying | Contrarian POV: most agencies still sell 'content volume' when the new game is citation-worthiness | Proof: 2/2 GEO pilots cited in Perplexity within 60 days, 142% organic at [Client] | Disqualifiers: anyone wanting to publish 50 blog posts a month, anyone unwilling to consolidate cornerstone content
Example output
30-second: 'The way buyers research changed. 60% of B2B research now starts in ChatGPT or Perplexity. Most agencies are still selling blog volume. We're built for citation-worthiness — fewer pages, deeper authority, real pipeline. We've gotten 2 of 2 clients cited in Perplexity in under 60 days.' 60-second: Same opening + 'I started NorthLoop because I was a VP marketing who'd been burned by 4 agencies that hid behind impressions. The game is different now. AI engines don't reward volume — they reward depth. So our retainers ship 4 great pieces a month, not 40 mediocre ones, and they're built to be the thing AI quotes.' 120-second: Add the [Client] story — 142% organic growth in year one + named in 3 Perplexity answers for category queries. Close: 'If you want a 50-post-a-month content factory, that's not us. If you want to be the authority an AI cites, that's exactly us.' Sharp opinions: - 'Content volume is a dying strategy.' - 'Most agencies sell motion, not outcomes.' - 'In 24 months, ranking #1 on Google will matter less than being quoted in ChatGPT.' Not for: clients chasing publishing volume, anyone unwilling to consolidate thin pages, sub-$5K/mo budgets.
Pro tips
- Workshop this with the founder in the room; if it doesn't sound like them, reps won't trust it.
- Drill all 3 versions verbatim in onboarding week — reps need muscle memory.
- Include the disqualifiers — being clear about who you're NOT for is what makes the narrative real.
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS callRelated prompts