Optimize · Cold Email Rewriting
Rewrite a Cold Email for a Founder vs Marketing Director
Take one email and produce two versions — one for the founder/CEO, one for the marketing director — each speaking to what they actually care about.
foundermanagerrepIntermediate⏱ ~30 min (saves writing 2 emails from scratch)
When to use
Use when you're prospecting into the same company at two levels (founder + marketing leader) or when your list is mixed and one email doesn't fit. Founders care about revenue, risk, and speed. Marketing directors care about their boss's metrics, their team's bandwidth, and not getting fired. Same offer, different framing.
The prompt
You are a senior outbound copywriter for a digital marketing agency. You've sold into both founders and marketing directors and you know the gap: founders buy speed + revenue + risk reduction; marketing directors buy team bandwidth + boss-metrics + career safety. Same agency, two completely different emails. Agency: [AGENCY_NAME] — [SERVICES] Company: [PROSPECT_COMPANY] — [COMPANY_CONTEXT] Founder/CEO contact: [FOUNDER_NAME], [FOUNDER_TITLE] Marketing director contact: [MARKETING_NAME], [MARKETING_TITLE] My current email (one-size-fits-all): [CURRENT_EMAIL] Proof points I can use: [PROOF_POINTS] Produce TWO rewritten versions of this email: Version A — for the FOUNDER: lead with revenue impact, speed-to-value, and risk. Founders don't read paragraphs about methodology; they want to know what changes in 90 days and what it costs them if they ignore it. Version B — for the MARKETING DIRECTOR: lead with how this helps them deliver the number their boss is measuring, removes a thing from their team's plate, or makes them look good in the next board update. Acknowledge they have a stack already. - Each version under 110 words - Both versions same offer, completely different framing — don't just swap the first name - Founder version: ban 'methodology', 'process', 'we partner with'. Use 'speed', 'revenue', 'risk', 'in 90 days' - Marketing director version: ban 'we'll transform your marketing'. Use 'reports up cleanly', 'off your plate', 'works alongside your team' - One specific CTA per version — can be the same or different - Reads like a peer at the right altitude for each role --- VERSION A (FOUNDER) --- Subject line: Email body: --- VERSION B (MARKETING DIRECTOR) --- Subject line: Email body: Key framing differences (3 bullets):
Variables
- [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency name
- [SERVICES] — Core services
- [PROSPECT_COMPANY] — Prospect company
- [COMPANY_CONTEXT] — 1-2 lines on the company — stage, size, what they sell
- [FOUNDER_NAME] — Founder/CEO first name
- [FOUNDER_TITLE] — Founder title (Founder, CEO, etc.)
- [MARKETING_NAME] — Marketing director first name
- [MARKETING_TITLE] — Marketing director title (VP Marketing, Head of Marketing, etc.)
- [CURRENT_EMAIL] — Your one-size-fits-all email
- [PROOF_POINTS] — Numbers and named results
Example input
AGENCY_NAME: Northbound SERVICES: SEO for B2B SaaS PROSPECT_COMPANY: Trelo COMPANY_CONTEXT: Series A B2B SaaS, $8M ARR, project management for agencies FOUNDER_NAME: Andre FOUNDER_TITLE: CEO + Co-founder MARKETING_NAME: Priya MARKETING_TITLE: VP Marketing CURRENT_EMAIL: Subject: SEO for Trelo / Hi [Name], We help SaaS companies with SEO. Open to a chat? PROOF_POINTS: Loopflow: 14k→90k organic in 9mo, 38% pipeline marketing-sourced; CAC payback Crelio 14→9mo
Example output
--- VERSION A (FOUNDER) --- Subject: 38% of pipeline in 9 months Andre — for Loopflow (similar stage, similar ARR), we took organic from 14k to 90k visits/mo in 9 months. Their CEO's number: 38% of pipeline now marketing-sourced, vs 11% before. For Trelo at $8M ARR, the math says organic could be your cheapest CAC channel by Q4. If it's not on the roadmap, you're paying paid prices for traffic that should be free. Want the 1-pager: 'what 90 days of SEO does for an $8M ARR SaaS'? No call. --- VERSION B (MARKETING DIRECTOR) --- Subject: organic pipeline % for the board update Priya — if marketing-sourced pipeline % is in your QBR, here's the angle: for Loopflow your peer-stage VP went from 11% to 38% marketing-sourced in 9 months, entirely from organic. We run as an extension of your team — content briefs handed to your writer or ours, technical work alongside your dev cycle. Nothing gets added to your plate. Want the playbook? It's a 1-pager you can drop into your next planning doc. Key framing differences: - Founder: revenue + cost-of-inaction. Director: board metric + team bandwidth. - Founder CTA: 'what 90 days does'. Director CTA: 'drop into planning doc'. - Founder: spoken to peer-CEO. Director: spoken to peer-VP, with awareness of internal politics.
Pro tips
- If you're sending both at the same company in the same week, mention you've also reached out to the other person — directors hate being blindsided.
- Founder version is usually 20-30% shorter. They scan; directors read.
- Test which version converts better — most agencies are surprised that the director version outperforms because directors actually run the eval.
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS callRelated prompts