Optimize · Objection Handling

Handle a "We're Happy With Our Current Agency" Objection

Crack open incumbent-agency complacency without trash-talking the competitor.

founderrepIntermediate⏱ Saves the 3-touch cadence usually wasted after a brush-off
When to use
Use this on first outbound calls, LinkedIn replies, or discovery calls when the prospect uses 'we already have an agency' as a polite shutdown. Especially useful for SEO, PPC, and web shops trying to displace an incumbent. Run it before any follow-up so you don't bash the competition and burn the relationship.
The prompt
You are a senior agency AE who has displaced incumbent agencies without disparaging them, by surfacing gaps the prospect didn't know to look for.
Agency: [AGENCY_NAME] — [SERVICES] | Prospect just said: "[PROSPECT_STATEMENT]" | Incumbent agency: [INCUMBENT_AGENCY] doing [INCUMBENT_SCOPE] | Known performance signals: [PERFORMANCE_SIGNALS] | Deal context: [DEAL_CONTEXT]
Give me a 4-part response: (1) translate what "happy with current" really means (genuinely happy vs. inertia vs. avoiding conflict vs. don't want to start over), (2) 1-2 clarifying questions to ask first, (3) a 3-4 sentence response script that respects the incumbent and creates curiosity, (4) the next-step ask — usually a low-commitment audit or benchmark.

- never disparage the incumbent agency by name or category
- acknowledge first — agree they should be loyal to a good partner
- do not pitch services in the script
- keep the spoken response under 90 seconds
- next step must be reversible and low-risk

Output exactly 4 labeled sections: WHAT THEY REALLY MEAN, CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, RESPONSE SCRIPT, NEXT-STEP ASK.
Variables
  • [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency name
  • [SERVICES] — What you offer that overlaps the incumbent
  • [PROSPECT_STATEMENT] — Verbatim brush-off from prospect
  • [INCUMBENT_AGENCY] — Name of current agency if known
  • [INCUMBENT_SCOPE] — What the incumbent is doing (channels, scope)
  • [PERFORMANCE_SIGNALS] — Any traffic, ranking, ad, or revenue signals you have on them
  • [DEAL_CONTEXT] — Channel, role of person, stage in conversation
Example input
[AGENCY_NAME]: Pier 9 Digital | [SERVICES]: paid media + landing pages for ecommerce | [PROSPECT_STATEMENT]: "Thanks but we're really happy with our current agency." | [INCUMBENT_AGENCY]: unknown, ~12 months in | [INCUMBENT_SCOPE]: Meta + Google ads | [PERFORMANCE_SIGNALS]: CPMs up 38% YoY per SimilarWeb, ROAS likely <2 based on their site speed | [DEAL_CONTEXT]: cold LinkedIn reply from Head of Growth at a $20M DTC brand
Example output
WHAT THEY REALLY MEAN
This is usually inertia, not genuine love. 'Happy' is the politest way to say 'I don't want to manage a switch right now.' If they were thrilled, they'd have told you a metric.

CLARIFYING QUESTIONS
1) "That's great to hear — out of curiosity, what's the one thing they've done in the last 90 days you'd brag about?"
2) "If you had to point at one channel that isn't pulling its weight, what would it be?"

RESPONSE SCRIPT
"Totally respect that — switching agencies is a tax most teams shouldn't pay. I'm not pitching a swap. We benchmark DTC accounts in your revenue band every quarter, and your category's blended CPMs jumped 38% this year. If your ROAS held, your agency is killing it. If it didn't, you'd probably want to know before renewal."

NEXT-STEP ASK
"Want me to send you the benchmark cut for your category — no call needed — and you decide if it's worth a 20-minute look?"
Pro tips
  • Never name a specific competitor agency negatively — prospects assume you'll do the same to them later
  • Lead with a benchmark or data asset, not a meeting — it's the lowest-friction way past 'we're happy'
  • Track renewal dates of the incumbent and re-touch 60-90 days before — that's when 'happy' becomes 'looking'
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS call
Related prompts