Structure · ICP & Niche Definition

Find Underserved Verticals for a Paid Media Agency

Surface 5-10 verticals where paid media demand is high but specialized agency supply is thin.

founderAdvanced⏱ ~6 hours
When to use
Use this when your generalist paid-media shop is hitting a positioning wall — too many agencies look exactly like you on a discovery call. Best for shops doing $500k-$3M ARR who want to specialize but haven't picked the lane yet.
The prompt
You are a paid media agency strategist who studies the agency market like a venture analyst — you know which verticals are over-agencied (legal, dentists) and which have ad-spend but no specialized providers.

Agency: [AGENCY_NAME]
Current paid media services: [CHANNELS] (e.g., Google, Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn, programmatic)
Current average client ad spend managed: [AVG_AD_SPEND]
Founder/team background and edge: [BACKGROUND]
Geo: [GEOS]
Revenue model: [PRICING_MODEL] (e.g., % of spend, flat retainer, hybrid)

Identify 5-10 verticals that meet ALL of these criteria:
1. The vertical's typical mid-market company spends $[AVG_AD_SPEND]/mo+ on paid media.
2. The channel mix matches our capabilities in [CHANNELS].
3. There are fewer than ~5 well-known specialized agencies serving this vertical (per public search, Clutch, LinkedIn).
4. The vertical has structural pressure to keep spending (regulation, competition, seasonality, growth).
5. Buying committees are reachable (have a CMO, growth lead, or owner-decision-maker).

For each vertical, provide: typical ad spend, channel fit, named competitors (or "none obvious"), why it's underserved, and the highest-leverage way for us to break in.

- Skip the obvious over-agencied verticals (dentists, lawyers, real estate agents, chiropractors, generic e-com).
- Don't recommend a vertical we can't credibly serve given our current channel mix.
- Be honest when you're inferring — flag low-confidence picks.
- Prefer verticals with recurring ad spend tied to a business metric (cost per lead, cost per booking) over brand-spend verticals.

Return a numbered list. For each vertical:
- Vertical name + 1-line description
- Typical monthly ad spend range
- Best-fit channel(s)
- Known specialized competitors (or "thin")
- Why underserved (1-2 sentences)
- Break-in move (1 specific action)
- Confidence: high / medium / low
Variables
  • [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency's name
  • [CHANNELS] — Paid channels you run well (Google, Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn, etc.)
  • [AVG_AD_SPEND] — Average monthly ad spend you manage per client
  • [BACKGROUND] — Founder/team background, industry experience, or edge
  • [GEOS] — Geographies you serve
  • [PRICING_MODEL] — How you charge — % of spend, flat retainer, hybrid
Example input
AGENCY_NAME: Tradewind Media. CHANNELS: Google, Meta, YouTube. AVG_AD_SPEND: $25k/mo. BACKGROUND: Founder spent 6 years at a DTC supplements brand running paid. Team of 4. GEOS: US + Canada. PRICING_MODEL: 12% of spend + flat $3k retainer.
Example output
1. **Veterinary hospital groups (multi-location)** — Roll-ups consolidating independent vet practices.
   - Spend: $15-60k/mo
   - Channels: Google + Meta
   - Competitors: thin — most use generalist local agencies
   - Underserved because: vet industry has been quietly rolled up by PE; new groups don't yet have specialized media partners
   - Break-in: cold outreach to PE-backed vet groups via PitchBook
   - Confidence: high

2. **Boutique fitness franchise systems (Tier 2/3 brands)** — Regional brands behind F45/Orangetheory tier.
   - Spend: $8-40k/mo per region
   - Channels: Meta + Google
   - Competitors: 2-3 known agencies, mostly serving top-tier brands
   - Underserved because: 50+ Tier 2/3 brands don't get attention from the F45-tier agencies
   - Break-in: sponsor IHRSA, build a public case study with one regional franchisee
   - Confidence: high

3. **Specialty B2B logistics (cold chain, hazmat, last-mile)** — Niches inside freight.
   - Spend: $20-80k/mo
   - Channels: Google + YouTube
   - Competitors: thin
   - Underserved because: B2B logistics is unsexy; most agencies chase SaaS
   - Break-in: publish CPL benchmarks per sub-niche
   - Confidence: medium

(...5-7 more)
Pro tips
  • Cross-reference results with Clutch and Sortlist to confirm 'thin competition' — Claude will sometimes overestimate the vacuum.
  • Pick the vertical where your founder's network can produce the first 3 meetings. Pure TAM means nothing in year one.
  • If you find a vertical where existing agencies are charging 15-20% of spend on small budgets, that's a sign the vertical is rich and underserved.
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS call
Related prompts