Optimize · Pricing / Offer Tests
Test an Annual Prepay Pricing Offer
Design a test for an annual prepay pricing offer with cash-flow math and explicit incentive design.
foundermanagerAdvanced⏱ 3-5 hours of cash-flow modeling
When to use
Use when monthly churn is hurting LTV, when cash flow is tight ahead of hiring, or when you want to lock in a strong cohort before a known seasonal dip. Skip if your delivery quality varies month-to-month — annual prepay locks in churn risk.
The prompt
You are an agency monetization strategist who runs pricing tests responsibly (no race to the bottom). You design experiments with explicit hypotheses, clear primary metrics, and pre-committed kill criteria so the agency learns regardless of outcome. Agency: [AGENCY_NAME] — [SERVICES] | Current offer: [CURRENT_OFFER] @ [CURRENT_PRICE]/mo | Win rate: [WIN_RATE] | Avg deal: [AVG_DEAL_SIZE] | Test audience: [TEST_AUDIENCE] | Hypothesis: [HYPOTHESIS] | Current avg tenure: [AVG_TENURE] | Cash discount rate: [DISCOUNT_RATE] | Refund policy: [REFUND_POLICY] Design a test for an annual prepay variant of the current offer, including the incentive level, refund/cancellation handling, target take rate, and how to read whether prepay is incremental revenue vs cannibalized monthly revenue. - Prepay discount must be ≤ true cash value of 12-month prepay (don't over-discount) - Refund policy must be explicit and contractual (pro-rata vs none vs milestones) - Track take rate AND incrementality (is prepay cannibalizing 12+mo monthly clients?) - Primary metric: 12-month cohort revenue vs control - Include risk of locking in poor-fit clients you can't easily offboard Sections: (1) Variant table (Monthly Control vs Annual Prepay), (2) Cash-Value Math (justifying discount), (3) Refund/Cancel Policy, (4) Take Rate Target + Incrementality Test, (5) Primary Metric + Decision Rule, (6) Kill Criteria.
Variables
- [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency name
- [SERVICES] — Core services
- [CURRENT_OFFER] — Current offer description
- [CURRENT_PRICE] — Current monthly price
- [WIN_RATE] — Current close rate %
- [AVG_DEAL_SIZE] — Current ACV
- [TEST_AUDIENCE] — Segment to test against
- [HYPOTHESIS] — What you expect
- [AVG_TENURE] — Avg client tenure in months
- [DISCOUNT_RATE] — Your cost of capital % (often 8-15%)
- [REFUND_POLICY] — Your current refund stance
Example input
Agency: Lumen Studio — Webflow dev retainers | Current offer: $7,500/mo dev retainer | Win rate: 26% | Avg deal: $56k LTV | Test audience: net-new clients, post-build phase | Hypothesis: 10% annual prepay discount lifts 12mo cohort revenue 8% by reducing month 3-5 churn | Avg tenure: 7.5 months | Discount rate: 10% | Refund policy: 30-day pro-rata
Example output
1) Variants: | Variant | Term | Price | Total Yr 1 | |---|---|---|---| | Monthly | Month-to-month | $7,500/mo | $90k (at avg 7.5mo: $56k) | | Annual Prepay | 12-mo upfront | $81k ($6,750/mo equiv, 10% off) | $81k locked | 2) Cash Math: 12-mo prepay at 10% cost of capital is worth ~$4.5k present value vs monthly billing. 10% discount = $9k cost, so net $4.5k cost — justified only if it lifts cohort revenue +$4.5k via reduced churn. 3) Refund: pro-rata refund after 90 days minus 15% admin fee; first 90 days non-refundable. 4) Take Rate Target: 25% of new closes. Incrementality: A/B by offer-shown — half of pitches see prepay option, half don't; compare 12-mo cohort revenue per pitch. 5) Primary: 12-mo cohort revenue per pitch. Decision: adopt if prepay-shown cohort >= +6% vs control. 6) Kill: refund requests >15% of prepay cohort, or take rate <10% (signal nobody wants it).
Pro tips
- Don't over-discount — compare your discount to your actual cost of capital, not a competitor's number
- A/B by offer-shown to measure incrementality; otherwise you can't tell if prepay is new revenue or cannibalized monthly
- Make your refund policy explicit in the contract — vagueness creates disputes that cost more than the discount
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS callRelated prompts