Tracking · Attribution & Source Tracking

Design First-Touch vs Multi-Touch Attribution Rules

Decide which attribution model to use for which decision, written as rules your team can actually follow.

foundermanagerAdvanced8-10 hours
When to use
Use this when leadership argues about 'which number is real' or when paid, content, and partnerships all claim credit for the same deal. Run before annual planning or before setting commission rules tied to source.
The prompt
You are a marketing analytics consultant for digital marketing agencies. You translate attribution theory into operating rules executives can defend.
Agency: [AGENCY_NAME] — [SERVICES] | CRM: [CRM_TOOL] | Analytics stack: [ANALYTICS_STACK] | Channels: [CHANNELS] | Avg sales cycle: [SALES_CYCLE] | Avg touches before close: [TOUCH_COUNT]
Define when to use first-touch, last-touch, linear, and U-shaped attribution. Tie each model to a specific business decision (budget, hiring, commission, exec reporting).

- Each model must be tied to ONE primary decision, not 'general reporting'
- Self-reported attribution must reconcile with platform attribution — explain how
- No double-counting credit across models in the same report
- Rules must be simple enough to apply without a data analyst in the room

1) Decision -> Model matrix (Decision | Model | Why | Owner)
2) Reconciliation logic: when platform and self-reported disagree, which wins and why
3) One-page exec summary the founder can show to the board
Variables
  • [AGENCY_NAME] — Your agency name
  • [SERVICES] — Service lines
  • [CRM_TOOL] — Your CRM
  • [ANALYTICS_STACK] — GA4, HubSpot, Dreamdata, Plausible, etc.
  • [CHANNELS] — Channels driving pipeline
  • [SALES_CYCLE] — Average days from first touch to close
  • [TOUCH_COUNT] — Average marketing touches before a deal closes
Example input
Agency: Northbeam Studio — SEO + paid social for DTC | CRM: HubSpot | Stack: HubSpot + GA4 + Dreamdata | Channels: SEO, podcast, LinkedIn outbound, partner | Cycle: 47 days | Avg touches: 11
Example output
DECISION -> MODEL
Budget allocation -> Linear (every channel that touched a closed deal gets fractional credit). Owner: Head of Growth.
Channel hiring -> First-touch (which channel originates pipeline). Owner: Founder.
Sales commission -> Last-touch outbound only (SDR who booked the meeting). Owner: Head of Sales.
Board reporting -> Self-reported + first-touch (one chart, two bars). Owner: CFO.

RECONCILIATION
If self-reported 'Heard from a friend' but UTM shows google/cpc — self-reported wins for source category, paid wins for assisted credit. Never both in the same revenue bar.

EXEC SUMMARY
We use 4 models, each for one decision. We never average them. If two models disagree, we report both and name the decision each is built for.
Pro tips
  • Pin the decision-to-model matrix in your reporting dashboard so nobody asks 'why is paid bigger here than there' again
  • Self-reported attribution beats platform attribution for source-of-truth — but only for deals over your AOV
  • Never tie commission to a multi-touch model — reps will not trust math they cannot explain to their spouse
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS call
Related prompts