Scale · Manager 1:1 & Coaching Frameworks
Design a Coaching-by-Call-Recording System
Stand up a repeatable call-recording review system that turns Gong/Fathom/Fireflies recordings into weekly rep skill gains.
managerfounderIntermediate⏱ 1-2 hours per rep per week vs. ad-hoc call review
When to use
Use when your team is recording calls (Gong, Fathom, Fireflies, Grain) but the recordings are gathering dust. This builds the operating system around the recordings — who reviews what, how often, what gets coached. Built for managers running 3+ reps.
The prompt
You are a sales manager coach for digital marketing agencies — every framework you ship makes a manager more useful in a 1:1 than they were last week.
Rep: [REP_NAME] | Tenure: [REP_TENURE] | Call recording link: [CALL_RECORDING_LINK] | Call type: [CALL_TYPE] | Service discussed: [SERVICE] | Current rep skill gap: [SKILL_GAP] | Recording tool: [RECORDING_TOOL]
Design a weekly call-recording coaching system — cadence, review rubric, 1:1 integration — that the manager runs across the whole team. Use this specific call as the worked example.
- Manager reviews 1 call per rep per week (not more — sustainability matters)
- Use a 5-dimension call rubric, same for every rep
- Rep self-reviews BEFORE the manager comments
- Coaching tied to ONE skill per week, not five
- System must survive a busy week — define the minimum viable cadence
Output: (1) weekly cadence table (who does what by when), (2) 5-dimension call rubric with 1-5 anchors, (3) a worked example review of this specific call with timestamps, (4) a 1:1 integration script ('how we discuss the call in our 1:1').Variables
- [REP_NAME] — Rep on the call
- [REP_TENURE] — Rep's tenure
- [CALL_RECORDING_LINK] — Link to the Gong/Fathom/etc. recording
- [CALL_TYPE] — Discovery, demo, scoping, close, etc.
- [SERVICE] — Service discussed on the call
- [SKILL_GAP] — Known skill gap to focus on (e.g. discovery depth)
- [RECORDING_TOOL] — Gong, Fathom, Fireflies, Grain, etc.
Example input
Rep: Tomás | Tenure: 9 months | Call recording link: fathom.video/abc123 | Call type: Discovery | Service: paid media retainer | Current rep skill gap: jumps to solution too fast | Recording tool: Fathom
Example output
Call Coaching System — Weekly Cadence: | Day | Who | Action | |---|---|---| | Mon | Rep | Pick 1 call, self-score on rubric, share with manager | | Tue-Wed | Manager | Review same call, score independently | | Thu | 1:1 | 10-min segment: compare scores, focus on biggest delta | | Fri | Rep | Apply 1 specific change on next live call | Rubric (1-5): 1. Opening: agenda + outcome stated (5 = explicit two-way agenda) 2. Discovery depth: layers of 'why' (5 = 3+ layers before solutioning) 3. Active listening: silence after questions (5 = >2s pauses, no overtalk) 4. Quantified pain: dollars/time named (5 = prospect quantifies, not rep) 5. Next step: scheduled on call (5 = calendar invite sent live) Worked example — Tomás, Cedar Grove discovery: - 04:12 — strong open, 4/5 - 09:30 — jumps to 'we'd run Performance Max' before asking about current attribution → discovery 2/5 - 22:40 — no quantified pain captured → 2/5 Focus skill: hold solution until minute 20. 1:1 segment (10 min): 'Where did our scores differ most? What was happening in your head at 09:30? What's one thing you'll do on Thursday's call instead?'
Pro tips
- 1 call per rep per week beats 5 calls once a month — coaching needs rhythm
- Force the rep to self-score first; the delta between self-score and manager-score IS the lesson
- Pin the rubric in the recording tool's call comments so every reviewer uses the same lens
Works with
ClaudeChatGPTGemini
Done with prompts? Time to install the system
Book a STAOS callRelated prompts